Day 3

Authenticity.... does it exist in the e-world?
"E-learning struggles with high drop out rates"
(from Preparing Students for Elearning http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/Preparingstudents.htm )
How do we evaluate if an interaction is authentic, and therefore valuable?
There is the concept of whether it is relevant to our world. This is important - but this is a gatekeeper - this determines if we even pause to consider the process.
Authenticity is essential to facilitate uptake of the information or experience.
Is it possible to measure authenticity in a virtual reality? When claims can be made, identities created, emotions expressed - with no tangible evidence.
Social networking - a form of 'connection' - a substitute for relationship.
What are our yardsticks for authenticity?
Surely they are history, reliability, consistency.
There is the body language - the frank, direct, unashamed eye contact, the relaxed posture, the ease of speech and ability to allow laughter.
There is the recommendation - from others who have encountered you.
The story is powerful - your story is powerful - and adds authenticity to a learning experience. But in a world where the skills in film production allow almost anything to look real, having a story retold is not a measure of it's authenticity.
I would suggest that without the human element, without the physical, tangible interactions, then we cannot truly measure authenticity. This essential element is in the domain of the person, the teacher, the student, and their real relationship. We are not out of a job!
If we leave it to a machine, there will always be a large potential for doubt.
And, I believe, this opens the door for the high drop out rates.